TL;DR. In 90 days most seed SaaS teams can scope Common Criteria, assign control owners, stand up MFA and access reviews, collect a starter evidence pack, pick an auditor, and complete Type 1 fieldwork—if leadership treats readiness as a weekly operating rhythm, not a side quest.
Claim ladder Material statements on this page are labeled Verified, Inferred, or Unknown per editorial standards.
Owner: FounderDone when: letter signed and scope frozen · Engagement letter
Readiness self-check
Owner: Checklist leadDone when: control list walked end-to-end with owners
Respond to PBC lists
Owner: Checklist leadDone when: provided-by-client requests answered within agreed SLA
Close gaps; schedule report for procurement
Owner: FounderDone when: gaps closed before opinion date; delivery date shared with sales · Week-2 procurement
If you miss a week, slide the calendar—do not compress evidence into a heroic weekend. Auditors sample operating rhythm.
Print checklist squares
Use the empty squares below when printing. This page does not save checkbox state (no localStorage). Educational only — completing squares does not mean you are audit-ready.
Week 0 folder + owner named
Days 1–30 scope + MFA baseline
Days 31–60 evidence rhythm running
Days 61–90 auditor engaged / fieldwork
Questions founders ask
Do we need a GRC tool in the first 90 days?
Not strictly. You need owners, evidence, and an auditor. Tools help when integrations save weekly hours.
Who should own the checklist?
A single accountable lead (often a founder or Head of Eng) with named control owners.
What if we miss day 90?
Extend honestly. Do not fabricate operating history.
Sources
Cost and timeline figures on this site are educational planning ranges, not quotes from AICPA, CSA, Shared Assessments, or any auditor.
practitioner ProofWindow educational planning ranges — ProofWindow Editorial — Internal: cost/timeline bands are editorial planning language, not a surveyed dataset. Label Unknown for hard dollars; never attribute invented figures to AICPA/CSA/SA.